Better Science Through Benchmarking: Lessons for Software Engineering
This event took place on Friday 04 June 2004 at 14:30
Susan Elliott Sim
Benchmarking has been used to compare the performance of a variety of technologies, including computer systems, information retrieval systems, and database management systems. In these and other research areas, benchmarking has caused the science to leap forward. Until now, research disciplines have enjoyed these benefits without a good understanding of how they were achieved. In this talk, I present a process model and a theory of benchmarking to account for these effects. These were developed by examining case histories of existing benchmarks and my own experience with community-wide tool evaluations in software reverse engineering. According to the theory, the tight relationship between a benchmark and the scientific paradigm of a discipline is responsible for the leap forward. A benchmark operationalizes a scientific paradigm; it takes an abstract concept and turns it into a guide for research. Application of this theory will be illustrated using an example from reverse engineering: the C++ Extractor Test Suite (CppETS), a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for the C++ programming language. This talk will conclude with a discussion of how insights from studying benchmarking can improve the science in software engineering and collaboration in scientific communities more broadly.
(No replay available due to a shortage of technical staff to record event on the day)
This event took place on Friday 04 June 2004 at 14:30
Benchmarking has been used to compare the performance of a variety of technologies, including computer systems, information retrieval systems, and database management systems. In these and other research areas, benchmarking has caused the science to leap forward. Until now, research disciplines have enjoyed these benefits without a good understanding of how they were achieved. In this talk, I present a process model and a theory of benchmarking to account for these effects. These were developed by examining case histories of existing benchmarks and my own experience with community-wide tool evaluations in software reverse engineering. According to the theory, the tight relationship between a benchmark and the scientific paradigm of a discipline is responsible for the leap forward. A benchmark operationalizes a scientific paradigm; it takes an abstract concept and turns it into a guide for research. Application of this theory will be illustrated using an example from reverse engineering: the C++ Extractor Test Suite (CppETS), a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for the C++ programming language. This talk will conclude with a discussion of how insights from studying benchmarking can improve the science in software engineering and collaboration in scientific communities more broadly.
(No replay available due to a shortage of technical staff to record event on the day)
Future Internet
KnowledgeManagementMultimedia &
Information SystemsNarrative
HypermediaNew Media SystemsSemantic Web &
Knowledge ServicesSocial Software
Knowledge Management is...
Our aim is to capture, analyse and organise knowledge, regardless of its origin and form and make it available to the learner when needed presented with the necessary context and in a form supporting the learning processes.
List all Knowledge Management Projects
Check out these Hot Knowledge Management Technologies:
List all Knowledge Management Technologies
