evidence hub technology full details
Evidence Hub
A collective intelligence platform for mapping a community and what it knows
The Evidence Hub concept is that we need better ways to pool, map and harness what a community knows. The Evidence Hub is a collaborative knowledge-building (specifically evidence-building) web platform. It was designed in KMI by the team developing the concept of "Contested Collective Intelligence" [1,2], where it is important to understand different perspectives and support quality debates. The first Evidence Hub was developed for the Open Learning Network project [3], and further refined in the Communities of Practice for Health Visiting project [4].
An Evidence Hub provides novel visual analytics designed to give insight into, and provoke reflection on, users’ knowlege-building activity. It is designed for use by practitioner communities/networks engaged in informal learning, and by students in more formal educational contexts.
The Evidence Hub is designed to answer questions such as:
• Who in my region is working on this problem?
• Are there any partnerships between projects in these two areas, on this theme?
• What are the key challenges we’re facing?
• Who has potential solutions to these, and what’s the evidence that they work?
• What evidence-based claims can we make with confidence?
• What are the most controversial issues?
The Evidence Hub concept has morphed and migrated to other groups who have ported it to other platforms and changed the conceptual model to suit their community's specific needs [5].
[1] De Liddo, Anna; Sándor, Ágnes and Buckingham Shum, Simon (2012). Contested Collective Intelligence: rationale, technologies, and a human-machine annotation study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21(4-5) pp. 417–448. http://oro.open.ac.uk/31052
[2] De Liddo, Anna and Buckingham Shum, Simon (2013). The Evidence Hub: harnessing the collective intelligence of communities to build evidence-based knowledge. In: Large Scale Ideation and Deliberation Workshop, 29 June - 02 July 2013, Munich, Germany. http://oro.open.ac.uk/38002
[3] De Liddo, Anna; Buckingham Shum, Simon; McAndrew, Patrick and Farrow, Robert (2012). The open education evidence hub: a collective intelligence tool for evidence based policy. In: Cambridge 2012: Joint OER12 and OpenCourseWare Consortium Global 2012 Conference, 16 - 18 April 2012, Cambridge, UK. http://oro.open.ac.uk/33253
[4] Ikioda, F. , Kendall, S. , Brooks, F. , De Liddo, A. and Buckingham Shum, S. (2013) Factors That Influence Healthcare Professionals’ Online Interaction in a Virtual Community of Practice. Social Networking, 2, 174-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/sn.2013.24017
[5] Open Education Research Hub: http://oerresearchhub.org
News
17 Jan 2020
KMi News
21 Apr 2015
KMi News
Siddharthan, A., Ponnamperuma, K., Mellish, C., Zeng, C., Heptinstall, D., Robinson, A., Benn, S. and van der Wal, R. (2019). Blogging Birds: Telling informative stories about the lives of birds from telemetric data. Communications of the ACM, 62(3), pp. 68–77. https://oro.open.ac.uk/55341/.
van der Wal, R., Zeng, C., Heptinstall, D., Ponnamperuma, K., Mellish, C., Ben, S. and Siddharthan, A. (2015). Automated data analysis to rapidly derive and communicate ecological insights from satellite-tag data: A case study of reintroduced red kites. Ambio, 44(Suppl 4), pp. 612–623. https://oro.open.ac.uk/51048/.
van der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A. and Siddharthan, A. (2016). The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3), pp. 550–561. https://oro.open.ac.uk/51049/.
Siddharthan, A., Lambin, C., Robinson, A.M., Sharma, N., Comont, R., O’Mahony, E., Mellish, C. and Van Der Wal, R. (2016). Crowdsourcing Without a Crowd: Reliable Online Species Identification Using Bayesian Models to Minimize Crowd Size. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 7(4), https://oro.open.ac.uk/51046/.












